Seafarers Happiness Index Drops as Connectivity, Wages Decline

The Seafarers Happiness Index fell to 6.81 in the third quarter of 2025, marking the third consecutive decline and highlighting widening gaps between shipboard and shore-based teams. The drop from 6.87 in Q2 and 7.26 in Q4 2024 reflects mounting dissatisfaction with connectivity, wages, and shore leave opportunities. Of the ten factors measured, four improved while six declined.
Connectivity saw the steepest drop, falling from 7.46 to 6.89. The report notes that industry expectations have shifted from simple Wi-Fi access to evaluating speed, reliability, privacy, and affordability. “Satisfaction is no longer measured by mere availability, but by whether access allows crew members to maintain normal, unhindered connections with home,” the authors stated. Restrictions on internet use limit seafarers’ ability to stay in touch with family, creating a distinction between being connected and feeling truly connected.
Wage Concerns and Rising Responsibilities
Wages recorded the second-largest decline, dropping from 6.86 to 6.56. Seafarers question whether static pay rates fairly compensate for increased responsibilities onboard modern vessels. One respondent noted, “Salary is [the] same for many years and not enough. We are working on an LNG tanker which is high risk and with more responsibilities, but no extra allowance.” The financial premium for maritime work has eroded due to inflation and improved shore-based benefits, prompting crews to reassess whether isolation and heavy workloads justify their compensation.
The assessment comes amid growing expectations for more complex vessels. As operations become more demanding, seafarers face rising pressures without corresponding pay adjustments. The disconnect between responsibilities and remuneration has become a significant factor in overall satisfaction scores.
Read Also: Asia-Europe shipping rates defy forecasts with October surge
Shore Leave Remains Lowest Priority
Shore leave continued to score the lowest among measured factors, declining to 5.46 from 5.72. The report identifies multiple constraints: increasing workloads, tighter port turnaround times, smaller crews, more isolated terminals, and heightened port security. “Its persistent position at the bottom points to a systemic failure rather than a temporary drop,” the authors wrote. Some seafarers question why the index continues measuring a benefit they rarely experience, with one respondent reporting no shore leave across four consecutive five-to-six-month contracts.
Workload Compression and Recovery Windows
While the workload score improved in the third quarter, the report highlighted ongoing concerns about workload compression. Port calls, which should offer recovery time, instead become the busiest parts of voyages due to simultaneous demands for cargo operations, bunkering, inspections, maintenance, and administrative tasks. “Permission to go ashore may exist, but operational urgency removes any practical opportunity to do so,” the report stated.
Training Progress and Crew Interactions
The index showed improvement in training and development, rising from 6.97 to 7.28. Positive reports of experienced colleagues providing quality instruction contrasted with previous feedback about repetitive, compliance-driven training programs. The interaction category also improved, climbing to 7.70 from 7.49.
The authors described this as potentially the report’s most important finding. Across feedback, good crews are characterized by family, friendship, cooperation, humour, respect, and mutual support. These relationships provide operational benefits alongside emotional value—cohesive crews communicate better, share pressure more effectively, and create environments where people are more willing to request assistance when needed.